New Day Agreement

May 2nd, 2012 Comments off

For statewide distribution…
We have a new Day Agreement that effectively extends our present contract by two additional years.

I want to thank our day bargaining team. They did an excellent job and deserve our thanks:

Rick Doud, chair
Tiffany Magnolia, vice chair
Claudine Barnes
Mary Folan
Donnie McGee
Ellen Pratt
Andria Schwortz
Margaret Wong
Diana Yohe
Katie d’Urso, spokesperson

Best,
Joe LeBlanc
MCCC

Emergency meeting

May 2nd, 2012 Comments off
STCC PA members:
The STCC PA Executive Committee has called a SPECIAL EMERGENCY MEETING to be held immediately following the conclusion of the Retirees/Services Award Recognition on Monday, May 7th at 1:15pm in Building 2/701. The meeting will last approximately 15-20 minutes.  Please make every effort to attend.

Last call for volunteers

April 23rd, 2012 Comments off
To all MCCC union members both full time and adjunct/part time:
Last call for volunteers to help us help you by volunteering to take one day out of your busy schedules to attend the MCCC Delegate Assembly this Saturday, April 28, 2012.
At this annual meeting members discuss and vote to set policy and goals for the up coming year, adopt our annual budget and our dues for 2012-21013.
Please volunteer to serve our union as we try to move forward in representing your interests both here at STCC and statewide.
To date I have the names of 8 of your colleagues who have volunteered to serve. We need 14 more to fill out our delegation and give us a strong voice in our union. Please let me know that you will attend.
thanks,
Rob.

Election Results

April 4th, 2012 Comments off
Since the candidates for the STCC Professional Association’s Executive Committee all ran unopposed, the forty-six PA members present at Monday’s meeting voted unanimously to elect the slate of candidates.  The newly elected (or re-elected)Executive Committee will hold office from July 1, 2012-June 30, 2014.
President:                                     Nicholas Camerota
Vice President:                             Eric Brown
Treasurer:                                     Daniel Hebert
Secretary:                                     Lynn McDonald
Board of Directors:                         Roberta Albano
At Large Member:                          Carole Dupont
At large Member Professional Staff: Vin Grassetti
At Large Member Part-time:            Julie Sokol

Change in the Deadline for the PA Nominations

March 27th, 2012 Comments off
Dear STCC PA Members
There has been a change in the Deadline for the PA Nominations. The date for the Deadline remains the same. But the time has been moved from 4 p.m. on Monday April 2, 2012 to 12 noon on the same day.
A candidate for any of the following offices must file this form, or a copy, with the STCC/PA Nominations and Elections Committee (in care of Michael Magala (Bldg. 13, rm. 304) by 12 noon on Monday, April 2, 2012.
Please take note of this change.

MCCC elections

March 21st, 2012 Comments off

Hi everyone,
This is a reminder that online voting for the MCCC elections closes on March 23 at midnight. While the officer positions are uncontested, candidates for the adjunct/part-time directors and delegates to the NEA-RA are not. All candidates would appreciate your voting in our first online election.

See the links below and please vote TODAY.

Best,
Joe LeBlanc
MCCC

http://mccc-union.org
http://twitter.com/mcccprez
http://facebook.com/mcccprezJoeLeBlanc
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mccc-union
http://www.strengthencommunitycolleges.org

Two Actions Requests

March 20th, 2012 Comments off

Dear MCCC Chapter leaders, members, and SAC representatives,

First, many thanks to all who took part in the Higher Education Lobby day at the State House on March 8th. It was a huge success. More than 600 higher ed. faculty, staff, students, alumni, union leaders, and administrators joined together to let the Legislature know that public higher education needs more funding. Many of them also emphasized that the Governor’s community college reform proposal was not in keeping with the mission of our colleges and the needs and goals of our students. Thanks as well to all who have lobbied their legislators to date about these two issues. Right now, the MCCC is not sure if we have enough legislative support to send the Governor’s reform proposal to a study. We need your help.

Two Actions Requests: Contact your Representative this week; report back to MCCC Leadership

1) Contact your Representative:
MCCC leadership needs to know where our MA Representatives (not Senators) stand on the Governor’s community college reform proposal. The House will be completing its budget deliberations in the next few weeks, so it is important that you call your Representative by Wednesday, 3/21 if you do not know his/her position on this proposal.

The Message: Ask Representatives to oppose the Governor’s plan and send it to a study committee chaired by the Joint Chairs of the Committee on Higher Education. Find out if your representative will or will not oppose this plan. Write down any questions, concerns, or suggestions that either the Representative or his/her staff may have.

Contacting Representatives:

To find out who your State Representative is, go to: www.wheredoivotema.com
To reach your representative by phone,
call the main State House number (617-722-2000) and ask to be connected to your legislator.

2) Report back your Representative’s stance or questions to your MCCC SAC representative and chapter President and copy me. SAC team members will be following up with phone calls and/or meetings with any Representative who needs more information. Be sure to report back by Friday, 3/23/12.

Background:
State Representatives are in the process of drafting their version of the State House budget. As you know, the Governor has attached a community college reorganization and reform proposal to his version of the state budget. The MCCC opposes the Governor’s plan because we do not want our campuses to lose their unique connections to our communities. We do not want Board of Higher Education to have the control to redirect the mission of our colleges in such a way that it will direct more resources towards workforce training at the expense of our current mandate to serve the needs and aspirations of all our students. We are concerned that this new reform proposal will undermine our colleges’ ability to provide transfer and accredited degree programs in the arts and sciences and the essential, transferable skills that all employers want for employees in the 21st century.

See the attached talking points for more discussion of these concerns.
To view online a related Fall River Herald News Guest Opinion that I authored, go to:

http://www.heraldnews.com/newsnow/x1907516970/GUEST-OPINION-Community-college-proposal-ignores-fundamental-issues?zc_p=0

MCCC Board Motion in opposition to the Governor’s proposal:

Note at the MCCC February Board of Directors’ meeting (2/24/12) a motion opposing this reform proposal was passed unanimously:

Motion: The MCCC believes that the only way for community colleges to promote student success and responsiveness to community and workforce needs is with an open, inclusive and transparent process. Therefore, the MCCC opposes Outside Section 30 of the Governor’s budget that proposes to eliminate the Legislature’s budgetary discretion and reorganize the community college structure. To that end, the MCCC asks the legislature to move the Governor’s outside section on community college reform to a study committee to be led by the Chairs of the Joint Committee on Higher Education.
Please lobby your REPRESENTATIVE ASAP. Your actions today could help preserve the current community college mission to make quality higher education accessible to all members of our communities. Please get involved.

Thank you,
Donnie

College Service

December 6th, 2011 Comments off

We are approaching the last day of classes and college service and advising forms are due.

FACULTY

College Service – FT Faculty – On the last day of classes, it is required that all full-time faculty submit College Service Activities (Form XIII-E5). On October 15, 2011, faculty submitted a list of  college service activities (upper part of this form under #1).  In the middle of the form under #2, faculty should list the activities with specific date(s) of participation (if applicable).  The “if applicable” language applies to activities that are on-going during a semester and no specific date can be determined. In the lower part of the form under #3, a few immediate supervisors have requested documentation that evidences participation in the college service activities.  If this request was made, it should have been done at the beginning of the semester in order to give faculty time to compile documentation as the activity is performed.  College service activities include:

  1. Serving as advisor to student activities;
  2. Serving on governance, ad hoc, college standing committees, system-wide task forces or committees, or labor-management committees;
  3. Preparing grant proposals;
  4. Participating in college, division, department or other related college meetings and/or activities;
  5. Participation in the improvement and development of academic programs and resources, including recruitment.
  6. Serving as a department chair/coordinator pursuant to Article XX and college-wide coordinators.

If faculty received reassigned time to perform non-instructional activities such as curriculum development, department chair work, professional development activities, or administrative (non-managerial) duties, then these activities should be listed on the College Service Activities (Form XIII-E5).  If there is a report associated with the above-referenced activity, then the report should be attached to the College Service Activities (Form XIII-E5).

Instructional Work -If faculty received reassigned time to perform individualized instruction and/or tutoring services, then these activities should be incorporated in the workload calculations on the Workload Form under the section for Instructional hours for individualized instruction.  Individualized instruction and/or tutoring can be performed in faculty offices or in learning centers.

(http://mccc-union.org/CONTRACTS/index.html#Workload_Computation_Form)

Student Advising – FT Faculty – On the last day of classes, full-time faculty are required to submit a Student Advisement Log – Form XIII-E4 including student’s name, program, date of conference, and recommendation/purpose.

 

PROFESSIONAL STAFF

College Service – FT Professional Staff – The professional staff College Service Activities – Form XIII-E5 is due by December 30 and May 30.  These college service activities should have been incorporated in the E-7 form that is completed on July 1 of each year. The contractual list of college service activities is:

1. Service as advisor for college-approved student activities;

2. Service on governance, ad hoc, college standing committees, system-wide task forces or committees; or labor-management committees;

3. Preparing grant proposals;

4. Participating in college, division, department or other related college meetings and/or activities as the President of the College or the President’s designee may deem appropriate;

5. Participation in the improvement and development of academic programs and resources, including recruitment.

Student Advising – FT Professional Staff – Student advising could be part of a professional staff workload and E-7 if appropriate by inclusion in the list of responsibilities in the classification specifications for the professional staff title.  The Student Advisement Log – Form XIII-E4 if appropriately assigned,is due on December 30 and May 30 each year.

The Legislature approved a major pension overhaul on Nov. 15

November 17th, 2011 Comments off
TO:         Local Association Presidents
                MTA Board of Directors
                MTA Staff
                LPAT Coordinators
FROM:  Paul Toner, MTA President
Legislature approves bill to cut pensions for future employees
MTA wins ORP and part-time-release amendments
The Legislature approved a major pension overhaul on Nov. 15 that will reduce retirement benefits for public employees hired after April 2, 2012, by requiring them to work longer for their benefits, increasing the minimum retirement age and reducing annual pension benefits by about 3 percent.
Governor Deval Patrick is expected to sign the bill into law.
The final bill did contain several amendments supported by the MTA, including allowing higher education members who participate in the Optional Retirement Program to transfer to the state retirement system, allowing creditable service for part-time release union representatives, reducing pension cuts for future long-serving public employees and increasing the base on which the annual cost-of-living-adjustment is calculated from $12,000 to $13,000.
MTA President Paul Toner said that good pension benefits are important for attracting and retaining high-quality education employees.
“We strongly opposed reducing pension benefits for future employees from the start,” Toner said. “Thousands of MTA members contacted their legislators, arguing that public employees in Massachusetts already pay the vast majority of the costs of their own pensions. We maintained that future employees should not be responsible for paying down an unfunded pension liability that was created by municipalities and the state, not by them.
“We lost those arguments,” he continued. “The recent volatility in the stock market and the weak economy persuaded legislators to limit the state’s exposure and costs by reducing future pension benefits.”
The pension bill is designed to save the state $5 billion over the next 30 years.
After the Senate approved the bill by a wide margin on Sept. 29, it became clear that the House was going to pass a similar measure. While continuing to oppose cuts in benefits for future members, the MTA also worked hard to win amendments that are important to certain current members and to long-serving future employees.
The bill reduces retirement benefits for future employees in several ways. It increases the minimum retirement age by five years, from 55 to 60, for teachers and other Group 1 employees, including MTA’s higher education members and education support professionals. The bill also changes the formula used for calculating benefits. As a result, most future MTA members will have to work about two years longer to receive benefits similar to what current employees will receive.
In addition, future pensions will be based on a five-year salary average rather than the current three-year average, typically reducing pensions by about 3 percent.
The Legislature agreed to amendments fought for by the MTA to reduce the impact on future employees with more than 30 years in the system. The formula changes will enable them to reach their maximum benefit levels earlier than employees with less than 30 years of service. In addition, the contribution rate for future Group 1 members will decrease after 30 years of service, from 11 percent to 8 percent for teachers and from 9 percent on the first $30,000 in income and 11 percent on the portion over $30,000 to a flat 6 percent for other future Group 1 employees.
The MTA fought hard for the ORP amendment. The ORP gives higher education members the option of participating in a defined contribution plan, similar to a 401(k) in the private sector, rather than in the state retirement system. Under the new bill, ORP participants will be able to transfer into the state retirement system and “buy back” prior public service.
The other significant win for the MTA was a no-cost amendment that will allow employers and unions to agree on part-time leave time for presidents and other union representatives without any loss of creditable service, provided they contribute into the retirement system at the same rate as other full-time district employees. Full-time release presidents already receive this benefit.
The bill contains other amendments that will benefit a small number of members, including revisions pertaining to creditable service for maternity leaves taken before 1975, an increase in the amount of salary a retiree can earn while collecting pension benefits and an increase in the minimum retirement benefit.

ORP Admendment

November 12th, 2011 Comments off
Attention ORP Faculty and Members:
The ORP Admendment is included in the State and House Pension Reform Bill.  The MTA  and MCCC Leadership urged you to please contact your Senator or Representativeand ask for their support of the House Pension Reform Bill.  The ORP language in the House Bill H.3790 relates to IRS Compliance.
Dear ORP Committee members, union leaders, ORP faculty, and MTA/MCCC union colleagues across this state,

 

Both the Massachusetts Senate and House have included ORP amendments in their pension reform bills that would allow for higher education employees who are currently enrolled in the Optional Retirement Plan (ORP) to have a one-time opportunity to transfer to the State Employees’ Retirement System (SERS). Pension legislation will now move to a Conference Committee to resolve the differences in the two bills, including some differences in the ORP language.

 

The MTA and MCCC leadership and higher education membership applaud legislators across the state for supporting ORP amendments to the pension bills that have passed in both Chambers  A key difference in the ORP language in the House bill is the requirement for a favorable IRS ruling prior to the implementation of this legislation. This would ensure that the provisions of that legislation would be in compliance with the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) and not affect the overall integrity of either the ORP or the SERS.

 

MTA and MCCC leadership support the addition of this IRS ruling provision as it would put to rest any remaining concerns in the State House related to IRC compliance issues. We therefore will recommend that the Conference Committee support the ORP language in the House bill: Sections 59 and 60 of H. 3790.

 

Contact State Legislators about the Pension Conference Committee Report:

We need you to contact your Legislators right away to ask for their support of the House’s ORP amendment language in the final pension bill. The Pension Conference Committee is expected to finalize its report before the close of formal legislative sessions next week. Please get involved if this legislation is important to you or your colleagues.

 

The Message:

 

  • Thank your Senator and your Representative for their recent support of an ORP provision in the proposed pension reform legislation.
  • Let them know that the ORP language is slightly different in the two pension bills. Ask them to support the ORP language in the House pension bill (Sections 59 & 60 in H. 3790) because of the inclusion of a requirement for a favorable IRS ruling before the implementation of this legislation. This House ORP language is supported by the Department of Higher Education and should put to rest any concerns related to the Internal Revenue Code compliance of this ORP to SERS transfer.
  • Ask your legislators if they would contact the members of the Pension Conference Committee to recommend support for the House pension bill’s ORP language (Sections 59 & 60 of H. 3790).

 

 

Contacting State Legislators:

 

Thank you for your continued political action in support of this ORP to SERS transfer initiative. We are moving towards the last leg of this legislative journey. Your actions today are key to the successful resolution of this ORP language by the Pension Conference Committee. Please encourage your colleagues across this state to join us in this campaign.

 

Donnie

 

Diana (Donnie) McGee
MCCC Vice President & SAC Chair
MTA Director & HELC Vice Chair
Email: vice-president@mccc-union.org
Cell: 508-415-1513